Waves on a Variable Beam

From WikiWaves
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Introduction

We consider here the equations for a non-uniform free beam. We begin by presenting the theory for a uniform beam.

An example of the motion for a non-uniform beam is demonstrated below:

Vibration of variable beam

Equations for a beam

There are various beam theories that can be used to describe the motion of the beam. The simplest theory is the Bernoulli-Euler Beam theory (other beam theories include the Timoshenko Beam theory and Reddy-Bickford Beam theory where shear deformation of higher order is considered). For a Bernoulli-Euler Beam, the equation of motion is given by the following


\partial_x^2\left(\beta(x)\partial_x^2 \zeta\right) + \gamma(x) \partial_t^2 \zeta = p

where \beta(x) is the non dimensionalised flexural rigidity, and \gamma is non-dimensionalised linear mass density function. Note that this equations simplifies if the plate has constant properties (and that h is the thickness of the plate,  p is the pressure and \zeta is the plate vertical displacement) .

The edges of the plate can satisfy a range of boundary conditions. The natural boundary condition (i.e. free-edge boundary conditions).


\partial_x^2 \zeta = 0, \,\,\partial_x^3 \zeta = 0

at the edges of the plate.

The problem is subject to the initial conditions

   \zeta(x,0)=f(x) \,\!
   \partial_t \zeta(x,0)=g(x)

Solution for a uniform beam in eigenfunctions with no pressure

If the beam is uniform the equations can be written as

 \beta \frac{\partial^{4}\zeta}{\partial x^{4}} + \gamma \frac{\partial^{2}\zeta}{\partial t^{2}}=0

We can express the deflection as the series

  \zeta(x,t)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} A_n X_n(x) \cos(k_n t) +  
\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}B_n X_n(x) \frac{\sin(k_n t)}{k_n}

where X_n are the Eigenfunctions for a Uniform Free Beam and k_m = \lambda^2_n \sqrt{\beta/\gamma} where \lambda_n are the eigenfunctions.

Then   A_n \,\! and  B_n \,\! can be found using orthogonality properties:

   A_n=\frac{\int_{-L}^{L}f(x)X_n(x)\mathrm{d}x}{\int_{-L}^{L}X_n(x)X_n(x)\mathrm{d}x} \,\!
   B_n=\frac{\int_{-L}^{L}g(x)X_n(x)\mathrm{d}x}{\int_{-L}^{L}X_n(x)X_n(x)\mathrm{d}x}

Note that we cannot give the plate an initial velocity that contains a rigid body motions which is why the sum starts at n=2 for time derivative.

Variational Techniques

As an alternative to solving the eigenvalue problem, we can equivalently minimise the Rayleigh Quotient (Linton and McIver 2001):

  R[\zeta]=\frac{\varepsilon[\zeta]}{H[\zeta]}

where  \varepsilon[\zeta] \,\! is known as the energy functional, and  H[\zeta] \,\! is some constraint.

In the case of a uniform beam with zero transverse load, our energy functional is (Lanczos 1949):

  \varepsilon[\zeta]=\frac{\beta}{2}\int_{-L}^{L}\left(\frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial x^2} \right)^2 \mathrm{d}x

If we choose

  H[\zeta]=\int_{-L}^{L}\gamma \zeta^2 \mathrm{d}x=1

Then minimizing the Rayleigh Quotient can be expressed as a variational problem

min   R[\zeta]=\frac{\beta}{2}\int_{-L}^{L}\left(\frac{\partial^2 \zeta}{\partial x^2} \right)^2 \mathrm{d}x

subject to  \int_{-L}^{L}\gamma \zeta^2 \mathrm{d}x=1

which will in turn, also solve our eigenvalue problem.

Rayleigh-Ritz method

We can essentially replace the variational problem of finding a  y(x) \,\! that extremises  J[y] \,\! to finding a set of constants  a_1, a_2, ..., a_N \,\! which extremise  J[a_1, a_2, ..., a_N] \,\!, through using the Rayleigh-Ritz method.

We solve

 \frac{\partial}{\partial a_k}J[a_1, a_2, ..., a_N]=0 \,\!

for all  k=1,2,...,N \,\!.

In our example of non-uniform beams, the assumption is made that we are able to approximate the eigenfunctions for a non-uniform beam as a linear combination of the eigenfunctions for a linear beam:

 \widehat{X}_n=\sum_{i=1}^{N}a_{i}X_{i}(x) \,\!

Solution for a Non-uniform free beam in eigenfunctions

In the case of a non-uniform free beam, the Euler-Bernoulli beam equation becomes:

 \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\left( \beta(x) \frac{\partial^{2}\zeta}{\partial x^{2}}\right) +\gamma(x)\frac{\partial^{2}\zeta}{\partial t^{2}}=0 \,\!

Using separation of variables, where  \zeta(x,t)=\widehat{X}(x)\widehat{T}(t) \,\!, we obtain a corresponding eigenfunction problem (with eigenvalues denoted by  \mu_n=\widehat{k}_n^4 \,\!):

 \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}\left( \beta(x) \frac{\partial^{2} \widehat{X}_n}{\partial x^{2}}\right)=\gamma(x)\mu_n \widehat{X}_n \,\!

which leads us to the following variational expression:

min   J[\widehat{X}_n]=\frac{1}{2}\int_{-L}^{L} \bigg\{\beta(x)(\widehat{X}_n^{''})^2 -\mu_n \gamma(x) \widehat{X}_n^2 \bigg\}\mathrm{d}x

We can approximate this using Rayleigh-Ritz and obtain:

 J[\vec{a}]=\frac{1}{2}\int_{-L}^{L} \bigg\{\beta(x)[\sum_{i=1}^{N}a_{i}{X}_{i}^{''}]^2 -\mu_i \gamma(x) [\sum_{i=1}^{N}a_{i}{X}_{i}]^2 \bigg\}\mathrm{d}x  \,\!

Then extremising  J[\vec{a}] \,\! as follows

 \frac{\partial}{\partial a_k}J[\vec{a}]=0 \,\!

for all  k=1,2,...,N \,\!, allows us to obtain:

 \frac{\partial}{\partial a_k}J[\vec{a}]=\sum_{i=1}^{N} \left\{ \int_{-L}^{L}\beta(x) {X}_{i}^{''} {X}_{k}^{''}\mathrm{d}x -\mu_i \int_{-L}^{L} \gamma(x){X}_{i}{X}_{k}\mathrm{d}x\right\}a_i=0 \,\!

for all  k=1,2,...N \,\! (here  \mu_i \,\! denotes both the Lagrange multiplier and eigenvalues of a non-uniform beam)

Converting to Matrix Form

If we define

 K_{ik}=\int_{-L}^{L}\beta(x) {X}_{i}^{''} {X}_{k}^{''}\mathrm{d}x \,\!
 M_{ik}=\int_{-L}^{L} \gamma(x){X}_{i}{X}_{k}\mathrm{d}x \,\!

then for all  k=1,2,...N \,\!:

 \frac{\partial}{\partial a_k}J[\mathbf{a}]=\sum_{i=1}^{N}(K_{ik}-\mu_i M_{ik})a_i=0 \,\!

Let us create the matrix  K \,\!, with elements  K_{ik} \,\!, the matrix  M \,\!, with elements  M_{ik} \,\!, the sparse matrix  \Lambda \,\! with  \mu_i \,\! terms on the diagonal, and the vector  \mathbf{a} \,\!. We can consequently express the above sum in the following way:

 (K-\Lambda M)\mathbf{a} = 0 \,\!

So we can solve for  \mathbf{a} \,\! in any of the problems below to obtain coefficients  a_i \,\!:

 (K-\Lambda M)\mathbf{a} = 0  \,\!
 K\mathbf{a}=\Lambda M\mathbf{a}  \,\!
 (M^{-1}K)\mathbf{a}=\Lambda \mathbf{a} \,\!

Quadrature

Rather than tediously evaluating an integral for each element of the matrices  K \,\! and  M \,\!, we can break up the integral into subintervals with weights  w_h \,\! using Composite Simpson's Rule:

 \int_a^b f(x) dx \approx \frac{h}{3} \left[ f(x_0)+2 \sum_{j=1}^{n/2-1}f(x_{2j})+4\sum_{j=1}^{n/2}f(x_{2j-1})+f(x_n)\right] \,\!
 \approx \frac{h}{3}\left[ f(x_0)+4f(x_1)+2f(x_2)+4f(x_3)+2f(x_4)+...+4f(x_{n-1})+f(x_n)\right] \,\!

So we can express  K_{ik} \,\! as follows:

 K_{ik}=\int_{-L}^{L}\beta(x) {X}_{i}^{''} {X}_{k}^{''}\mathrm{d}x \,\!
 \approx \sum \beta(x_h){X}_{i}^{''}(x_h) {X}_{k}^{''}(x_h)w_h \,\!
 \approx \vec{X}_{i}^{''} H \vec{X}_{k}^{''T}  \,\!

where

 \vec{X}_i^{''}=[X_i^{''}(x_1),X_i^{''}(x_2),...,X_i^{''}(x_h)] \,\!

 H =
\begin{bmatrix}
  \beta(x_1)w_1 & 0 & ... &0 \\
  0 & \beta(x_2)w_2 & ... &0 \\
  \vdots &  & \ddots&\vdots \\
  0 & ... & ...&\beta(x_h)w_h
\end{bmatrix}
\,\!

and weights  w_h \,\! are defined as:  w_1=h/3, w_2=4h/3, ... , w_h=h/3 \,\!.

We can extend this concept to the the full matrix  K \,\! if we form:

 K=X^{''}_{mat}H X^{''T}_{mat}  \,\!

where

 X^{''}_{mat} =
\begin{bmatrix}
{X}_{1}^{''}(x_1) & {X}_{1}^{''}(x_2) & ... & {X}^{''}_{1}(x_h) \\
{X}_{2}^{''}(x_1) & {X}_{2}^{''}(x_2) & ... & {X}^{''}_{2}(x_h) \\
\vdots & \vdots & & \vdots \\
{X}_{N}^{''}(x_1) & {X}_{N}^{''}(x_2) & ... & {X}^{''}_{N}(x_h)
\end{bmatrix}
\,\!

For  M \,\! we use an identical approach:

 M=X_{mat}J X^{T}_{mat} \,\!

where

 J =
\begin{bmatrix}
\gamma(x_1)w_1 & 0 & ... &0 \\
0 & \gamma(x_2)w_2 & ... &0 \\
\vdots &  & \ddots&\vdots \\
0 & ... & ...&\gamma(x_h)w_h
\end{bmatrix}
\,\!

 X_{mat} =
\begin{bmatrix}
{X}_{1}(x_1) & {X}_{1}(x_2) & ... & {X}_{1}(x_h) \\
{X}_{2}(x_1) & {X}_{2}(x_2) & ... & {X}_{2}(x_h) \\
\vdots & \vdots & & \vdots \\
{X}_{N}(x_1) & {X}_{N}(x_2) & ... & {X}_{N}(x_h)
\end{bmatrix}
\,\!

Evaluation

Using the MATLAB program eig.m, we can solve the eigenvalue problem

 K\vec{a}=\Lambda M\vec{a} \,\!

using the either of the commands

[Ai_values,nonuniform_eigvals] = eig(M^(-1)*K)
[Ai_values,nonuniform_eigvals] = eig(K,M)

Where the diagonal of nonuniform_eigvals denotes the eigenvalues for the nonuniform beam ( \mu_n \,\!), and each column of the matrix Ai_values represents the coefficients  a_1, a_2,... \,\! corresponding to  \widehat{X}_n \,\!:

 \widehat{X}_n=\sum_{i=1}^{N}a_{i}X_{i}(x) \,\!

We can obtain the matrix  \widehat{X}_{mat} \,\! by taking Xhat_mat= Ai_valuesTX_mat.

Non-uniform beam revisited

We have already solved the eigenfunction problem. We now turn our attention to the time component arising from separation of variables:

 \widehat{T}_n^{''}+\mu_n\widehat{T}_n=0 \,\!

which has solutions of the form

 \widehat{T}_n(t)=A_n \cos(\widehat{k}_n^2 t)+B_n \sin(\widehat{k}_n^2 t) \,\!

Introducing the initial conditions

 v(x,0)=f(x) \,\!
  \frac{\partial v(x,0)}{\partial t}=g(x)\,\!

Then using the the first of these initial conditions we obtain:

 \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}A_n\widehat{X}_n(x)=f(x) \,\!

multiplying by  m(x)\widehat{X}_n(x) \,\! and integrating allows us to obtain:

 A_n=\frac{\int_{-L}^{L}f(x)m(x)\widehat{X}_n(x)\mathrm{d}x}{\int_{-L}^{L}m(x)\widehat{X}_n(x)\widehat{X}_n(x)\mathrm{d}x} \,\!

Then using the second initial condition, and applying the same technique yields

 B_n=\frac{1}{\widehat{k}_n^2}\frac{\int_{-L}^{L}g(x)m(x)\widehat{X}_n(x)\mathrm{d}x}{\int_{-L}^{L}m(x)\widehat{X}_n(x)\widehat{X}_n(x)\mathrm{d}x} \,\!

Consequently,

 v(x,t)=A_0\widehat{X}_0(x)+A_1\widehat{X}_1(x)+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} A_n\widehat{X}_n(x)\cos(\widehat{k}_n^2 t)+\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} B_n\widehat{X}_n(x) \sin(\widehat{k}_n^2 t)  \,\!

where  \widehat{X}_0(x) \,\! and  \widehat{X}_2(x) \,\! are the two rigid modes of the non-uniform beam. Note that  B_0 \,\! and  B_1 \,\! do not exist.

Matlab Code

A program to solve for a variable beam can be found here variable_beam.m

Additional code

This program requires

References

Lanczos 1949, Linton and McIver 2001, Rao 1986

Personal tools