McIver 1996: Difference between revisions
From WikiWaves
Jump to navigationJump to search
Added a brief description of the paper |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
M. McIver 1996 An example of non-uniqueness in the two-dimensional water wave problem. ''Journal of Fluid Mechanics'', '''315''', 257-266. | [[Maureen McIver|M. McIver]] 1996 An example of non-uniqueness in the two-dimensional water wave problem. ''Journal of Fluid Mechanics'', '''315''', 257-266. | ||
This is a very significant paper, proving that the two-dimensional water wave problem is | This is a very significant paper, proving that the two-dimensional water wave problem is | ||
not unique. The proof relied on constructing a counter example by producing a wave-free | not unique. The proof relied on constructing a counter example by producing a wave-free | ||
potential which had streamlines which bounded the sigularities. This paper is the starting | potential which had streamlines which bounded the sigularities. This paper is the starting | ||
point for the construction of [[ | point for the construction of [[Trapped Modes]]. | ||
[[Category:Reference]] | |||
Latest revision as of 01:33, 2 June 2006
M. McIver 1996 An example of non-uniqueness in the two-dimensional water wave problem. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 315, 257-266.
This is a very significant paper, proving that the two-dimensional water wave problem is not unique. The proof relied on constructing a counter example by producing a wave-free potential which had streamlines which bounded the sigularities. This paper is the starting point for the construction of Trapped Modes.
